<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iBiquity Digital raises yet another round to fuel HD Radio ambitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert F Corbin</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800745</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert F Corbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800745</guid>
		<description>“Demand has been slow to take off, in part because 200 million or so people still prefer the older AM/FM radio.”

To use the same quote as Glenn did above, there&#039;s no incentive to people to buy these radios, not in Hampton Roads (SE VA).  Most stations are NOT doing a subchannel.

But I do wonder about Glenn&#039;s comment... “The diversity of programming is still very similar to what we see on commercial radio: more of the same.”  Well, one of the subchannels heard around here is &quot;All Comedy Network.&quot;  How long would one listen to this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Demand has been slow to take off, in part because 200 million or so people still prefer the older AM/FM radio.”</p>
<p>To use the same quote as Glenn did above, there&#8217;s no incentive to people to buy these radios, not in Hampton Roads (SE VA).  Most stations are NOT doing a subchannel.</p>
<p>But I do wonder about Glenn&#8217;s comment&#8230; “The diversity of programming is still very similar to what we see on commercial radio: more of the same.”  Well, one of the subchannels heard around here is &#8220;All Comedy Network.&#8221;  How long would one listen to this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg2</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800658</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800658</guid>
		<description>@Glenn

“I’m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.”

“Have 200 HD Radio stations gone missing?”

“The HD Radio camp is advertising that there are currently over 1,500 radio stations now broadcasting in HD (from its website, to press releases as well as in various other promotions)… but yet only 1,300 have filed with the FCC.”

http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html

Missing-in-action, Glenn? Whatever happened to those 200 missing HD stations?

HD/IBOC also jams itself, and others, on both FM and AM:

“HD Interference: Not Just For AM Anymore”

“Radio World Engineering Extra dropped a bomb this month with a very provocative cover story: ‘What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?’ Written by Doug Vernier, the man who authored the technical specifications for an ongoing Corporation for Public Broadcasting-sponsored HD Radio interference analysis, the report is the first of its kind to document interference between FM-HD stations around the country. Using anecdotal reportage, some sophisticated contour-mapping, and presumably ‘early data’ from the CPB study, Vernier’s article conclusively proves how stations running in hybrid HD/analog mode can (and do) interfere somewhat significantly with not only themselves, but their neighbors on the FM dial.”

http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307

“AM Broadcasters Back Away from HD Deployment”

“This is a major setback for the adoption of HD Radio, especially on the AM dial, and Citadel is the first large broadcast conglomerate to back away from full deployment of the HD broadcast technology. Although the company’s gone out of its way not to characterize its move an indictment of iBiquity’s proprietary digital broadcast standard, the problems with AM HD broadcast interference are well-known and -documented.”

http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307

Let’s tell the whole truth here, Glenn. FM-HD jams, too. Wait until the proposed 10db FM-HD power increase, if aproved, and if any of the HD stations could afford to replace all existing HD hardware. LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glenn</p>
<p>“I’m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.”</p>
<p>“Have 200 HD Radio stations gone missing?”</p>
<p>“The HD Radio camp is advertising that there are currently over 1,500 radio stations now broadcasting in HD (from its website, to press releases as well as in various other promotions)… but yet only 1,300 have filed with the FCC.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html</a></p>
<p>Missing-in-action, Glenn? Whatever happened to those 200 missing HD stations?</p>
<p>HD/IBOC also jams itself, and others, on both FM and AM:</p>
<p>“HD Interference: Not Just For AM Anymore”</p>
<p>“Radio World Engineering Extra dropped a bomb this month with a very provocative cover story: ‘What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?’ Written by Doug Vernier, the man who authored the technical specifications for an ongoing Corporation for Public Broadcasting-sponsored HD Radio interference analysis, the report is the first of its kind to document interference between FM-HD stations around the country. Using anecdotal reportage, some sophisticated contour-mapping, and presumably ‘early data’ from the CPB study, Vernier’s article conclusively proves how stations running in hybrid HD/analog mode can (and do) interfere somewhat significantly with not only themselves, but their neighbors on the FM dial.”</p>
<p><a href="http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307" rel="nofollow">http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307</a></p>
<p>“AM Broadcasters Back Away from HD Deployment”</p>
<p>“This is a major setback for the adoption of HD Radio, especially on the AM dial, and Citadel is the first large broadcast conglomerate to back away from full deployment of the HD broadcast technology. Although the company’s gone out of its way not to characterize its move an indictment of iBiquity’s proprietary digital broadcast standard, the problems with AM HD broadcast interference are well-known and -documented.”</p>
<p><a href="http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307" rel="nofollow">http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307</a></p>
<p>Let’s tell the whole truth here, Glenn. FM-HD jams, too. Wait until the proposed 10db FM-HD power increase, if aproved, and if any of the HD stations could afford to replace all existing HD hardware. LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PocketRadio4</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800647</link>
		<dc:creator>PocketRadio4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800647</guid>
		<description>@Glenn

&quot;I’m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.&quot;

&quot;Have 200 HD Radio stations gone missing?&quot;

&quot;The HD Radio camp is advertising that there are currently over 1,500 radio stations now broadcasting in HD (from its website, to press releases as well as in various other promotions)... but yet only 1,300 have filed with the FCC.&quot;

http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html

Missing-in-action, Glenn?

HD/IBOC also jams itself, and others, on both FM and AM:

&quot;HD Interference: Not Just For AM Anymore&quot;

&quot;Radio World Engineering Extra dropped a bomb this month with a very provocative cover story: &#039;What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?&#039; Written by Doug Vernier, the man who authored the technical specifications for an ongoing Corporation for Public Broadcasting-sponsored HD Radio interference analysis, the report is the first of its kind to document interference between FM-HD stations around the country. Using anecdotal reportage, some sophisticated contour-mapping, and presumably &#039;early data&#039; from the CPB study, Vernier&#039;s article conclusively proves how stations running in hybrid HD/analog mode can (and do) interfere somewhat significantly with not only themselves, but their neighbors on the FM dial.&quot;

http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307

&quot;AM Broadcasters Back Away from HD Deployment&quot;

&quot;This is a major setback for the adoption of HD Radio, especially on the AM dial, and Citadel is the first large broadcast conglomerate to back away from full deployment of the HD broadcast technology. Although the company&#039;s gone out of its way not to characterize its move an indictment of iBiquity&#039;s proprietary digital broadcast standard, the problems with AM HD broadcast interference are well-known and -documented.&quot;

http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307

Let&#039;s tell the whole truth here, Glenn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glenn</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Have 200 HD Radio stations gone missing?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The HD Radio camp is advertising that there are currently over 1,500 radio stations now broadcasting in HD (from its website, to press releases as well as in various other promotions)&#8230; but yet only 1,300 have filed with the FCC.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/have-200-hd-radio-stations-gone-missing.html</a></p>
<p>Missing-in-action, Glenn?</p>
<p>HD/IBOC also jams itself, and others, on both FM and AM:</p>
<p>&#8220;HD Interference: Not Just For AM Anymore&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Radio World Engineering Extra dropped a bomb this month with a very provocative cover story: &#8216;What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?&#8217; Written by Doug Vernier, the man who authored the technical specifications for an ongoing Corporation for Public Broadcasting-sponsored HD Radio interference analysis, the report is the first of its kind to document interference between FM-HD stations around the country. Using anecdotal reportage, some sophisticated contour-mapping, and presumably &#8216;early data&#8217; from the CPB study, Vernier&#8217;s article conclusively proves how stations running in hybrid HD/analog mode can (and do) interfere somewhat significantly with not only themselves, but their neighbors on the FM dial.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307" rel="nofollow">http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307</a></p>
<p>&#8220;AM Broadcasters Back Away from HD Deployment&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a major setback for the adoption of HD Radio, especially on the AM dial, and Citadel is the first large broadcast conglomerate to back away from full deployment of the HD broadcast technology. Although the company&#8217;s gone out of its way not to characterize its move an indictment of iBiquity&#8217;s proprietary digital broadcast standard, the problems with AM HD broadcast interference are well-known and -documented.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307" rel="nofollow">http://diymedia.net/archive/1007.htm#101307</a></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s tell the whole truth here, Glenn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800626</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800626</guid>
		<description>&quot;Demand has been slow to take off, in part because 200 million or so people still prefer the older AM/FM radio.&quot;: Not very on-spot analysis. The new radios are still relatively expensive. There is no HD Radio built into any but a few expensive receivers, which is where HD would hit the home market. HD is a standard feature in few cars (although many more models are coming). It&#039;s a $200 to $400 add-on for most existing car radios.

Frankly, despite having written about HD Radio for years (for the New York Times, Popular Science, and my own blog on digital AM/FM), I&#039;m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.

The reason? The diversity of programming is still very similar to what we see on commercial radio: more of the same. Public radio is offering interesting alternatives, but they&#039;ll only be able to broadcast 3 to 5 channels, which doesn&#039;t make for viable alternatives. The only way the programming side becomes interesting is if there&#039;s a lot more interest in putting &quot;niche&quot; programming (stuff that XM/Sirius devotes multiple channels to) in the sub-channels on FM.

There are also serious technical issue with nighttime AM broadcasting that haven&#039;t been fully exposed to the light of day, as it were. Radio World, an industry publication, has written extensively about early problems with nighttime AM broadcasts, where digital signals interfere with analog stations. It&#039;s not clear what needs to be done to improve that situation, or whether it&#039;s uniformly a problem.

The commenter above are the Peanut Gallery. They, like me, obviously have Yahoo or Google keyword news feeds for HD Radio. Whenever they get a link to a post, they post links to stuff and irate screeds. They focus on the big, underreported FCC giveaway to iBiquity (a single technology controlled by a single firm was given the nod for the future of terrestrial radio with little review).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Demand has been slow to take off, in part because 200 million or so people still prefer the older AM/FM radio.&#8221;: Not very on-spot analysis. The new radios are still relatively expensive. There is no HD Radio built into any but a few expensive receivers, which is where HD would hit the home market. HD is a standard feature in few cars (although many more models are coming). It&#8217;s a $200 to $400 add-on for most existing car radios.</p>
<p>Frankly, despite having written about HD Radio for years (for the New York Times, Popular Science, and my own blog on digital AM/FM), I&#8217;m pretty bearish on the technology despite about 2,000 radio stations broadcasting in HD format.</p>
<p>The reason? The diversity of programming is still very similar to what we see on commercial radio: more of the same. Public radio is offering interesting alternatives, but they&#8217;ll only be able to broadcast 3 to 5 channels, which doesn&#8217;t make for viable alternatives. The only way the programming side becomes interesting is if there&#8217;s a lot more interest in putting &#8220;niche&#8221; programming (stuff that XM/Sirius devotes multiple channels to) in the sub-channels on FM.</p>
<p>There are also serious technical issue with nighttime AM broadcasting that haven&#8217;t been fully exposed to the light of day, as it were. Radio World, an industry publication, has written extensively about early problems with nighttime AM broadcasts, where digital signals interfere with analog stations. It&#8217;s not clear what needs to be done to improve that situation, or whether it&#8217;s uniformly a problem.</p>
<p>The commenter above are the Peanut Gallery. They, like me, obviously have Yahoo or Google keyword news feeds for HD Radio. Whenever they get a link to a post, they post links to stuff and irate screeds. They focus on the big, underreported FCC giveaway to iBiquity (a single technology controlled by a single firm was given the nod for the future of terrestrial radio with little review).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobyoung</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800625</link>
		<dc:creator>bobyoung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800625</guid>
		<description>HD radio is not going anywhere because it is worthless technology which does not work. It is a scam and no one wants it. It cuts receive range and creates adjacent channel interference both on AM and FM. The sound is nowhere near as good as promised, especially with a side channel running HD2, AM HD? Forget it, can you spell HASH? You need roof top antennas if you want to get a lock n it within 10-20 miles of the transmitters (if you are lucky). There are engineers who live in Manhattan within site of the Empire State Building which has HD transmitters on it who CAN&#039;T receive the HD signals, great stuff, huh? Yup, I&#039;m going to go get me a shiny new radio for 200.00 that does nothing but sits there and looks pretty.
Ibiquity is making money off their monopoly by selling transmitters and charging annual fees and will milk this failure until they&#039;re forced out of business when radio finally sees through the scam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HD radio is not going anywhere because it is worthless technology which does not work. It is a scam and no one wants it. It cuts receive range and creates adjacent channel interference both on AM and FM. The sound is nowhere near as good as promised, especially with a side channel running HD2, AM HD? Forget it, can you spell HASH? You need roof top antennas if you want to get a lock n it within 10-20 miles of the transmitters (if you are lucky). There are engineers who live in Manhattan within site of the Empire State Building which has HD transmitters on it who CAN&#8217;T receive the HD signals, great stuff, huh? Yup, I&#8217;m going to go get me a shiny new radio for 200.00 that does nothing but sits there and looks pretty.<br />
Ibiquity is making money off their monopoly by selling transmitters and charging annual fees and will milk this failure until they&#8217;re forced out of business when radio finally sees through the scam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PocketRadio3</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800624</link>
		<dc:creator>PocketRadio3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800624</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who needs &#039;Tagging&#039; for HD radio?&quot;

&quot;No &#039;HD tagging&#039; required. No HD radios required, in fact. Why buy a new radio in order to tag your songs when you can do it on an iPod right now?&quot;

http://www.hear2.com/2008/02/who-needs-taggi.html

That&#039;s all folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who needs &#8216;Tagging&#8217; for HD radio?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No &#8216;HD tagging&#8217; required. No HD radios required, in fact. Why buy a new radio in order to tag your songs when you can do it on an iPod right now?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hear2.com/2008/02/who-needs-taggi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hear2.com/2008/02/who-needs-taggi.html</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s all folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PocketRadio2</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800621</link>
		<dc:creator>PocketRadio2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800621</guid>
		<description>“HD Radio on the Offense”

“But after an investigation of HD Radio units, the stations playing HD, and the company that owns the technology; and some interviews with the wonks in DC, it looks like HD Radio is a high-level corporate scam, a huge carny shill.”

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“HD Radio on the Offense”</p>
<p>“But after an investigation of HD Radio units, the stations playing HD, and the company that owns the technology; and some interviews with the wonks in DC, it looks like HD Radio is a high-level corporate scam, a huge carny shill.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense" rel="nofollow">http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PocketRadio</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-800618</link>
		<dc:creator>PocketRadio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/28/ibiquity-digital-raises-yet-another-round-to-fuel-hd-radio-ambitions/#comment-800618</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of suckers - HD Radio is a farce:

http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of suckers &#8211; HD Radio is a farce:</p>
<p><a href="http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
