<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glam, fast-growing woman&#8217;s network, makes ad change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Women-focused media site Glam launches developer network &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-822024</link>
		<dc:creator>Women-focused media site Glam launches developer network &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-822024</guid>
		<description>[...] weeks ago, it expanded Glam Evolution, a way for publishers to assert more control over their remnant ad space by running ads from a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weeks ago, it expanded Glam Evolution, a way for publishers to assert more control over their remnant ad space by running ads from a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cogblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati Executes a YAAN Strategy that WILL NOT WORK</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-817250</link>
		<dc:creator>Cogblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati Executes a YAAN Strategy that WILL NOT WORK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-817250</guid>
		<description>[...] marketplace.  Glam did this by taking their tens of millions in venture capital and using it as a loss leader to overpay for inventory relative to the value of that inventory to Glam.  Technorati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marketplace.  Glam did this by taking their tens of millions in venture capital and using it as a loss leader to overpay for inventory relative to the value of that inventory to Glam.  Technorati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adotas &#187; Glam Media Overhauls Its Advertising Model</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-800945</link>
		<dc:creator>Adotas &#187; Glam Media Overhauls Its Advertising Model</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-800945</guid>
		<description>[...] Three major changes are afoot, according to VentureBeat: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Three major changes are afoot, according to VentureBeat: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo polishes Shine for the ladies &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-800825</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo polishes Shine for the ladies &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-800825</guid>
		<description>[...] Female targeted sites such as CafeMom have been growing quickly and receiving funding thanks in part to its strong partnerships with advertisers (our coverage). Glam is another female-oriented content and ad network that has been making a lot of headlines recently for both its growth and the big money attached to it (our coverage). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Female targeted sites such as CafeMom have been growing quickly and receiving funding thanks in part to its strong partnerships with advertisers (our coverage). Glam is another female-oriented content and ad network that has been making a lot of headlines recently for both its growth and the big money attached to it (our coverage). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor At Large</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-800813</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor At Large</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-800813</guid>
		<description>Editor At Large
As posted on TC as well

March 30th, 2008 at 9:05 pm

I have to admit that when I received that e-mail from Glam I was very worried. I have an exclusive contract with Glam for all of my sites and it provides 100% of my revenue. I immediately contacted Julieta Alvarado Glam’s Community Director and the person I prefer to deal with over there. She told me that Glam was contractually obligated to pay on their minimums whether they serve a house ad or not.

She explained to me why there were doing this, she took the time to put my mind at ease and referred to the section in the e-mail that says: “On March 25, Glam will reduce the number of house ads we deliver to your site and will begin serving the new default ads in their place. However, we will continue to run paid house ads on your site to fulfill the minimum commitments that Glam has contractually agreed to”.

Now that I understand how this new system works I am even more firm in my decision to stay with Glam.

I have been a network member since 2006 and so far I have nothing but good things to say about Glam. I don’t see how this new system is detrimental to bloggers. It will give us more choices and opportunities to make money.

Besides the money I make in banner ads I get revenue from other programs that Glam offers. I just do not see Federated Media or Gorilla Nation doing that.

I looked into Federated and Gorilla and the experience of dealing with them, specially Gorilla left a bitter taste in my mouth.

I will stick with Glam for the foreseable future: They provide me with very decent CPMs, other revenue opportunities and treat me as a valued partner in their business.

This posting may be a case of a blogger getting hysterical over something she or he doesn’t understand. If I were Glam I would be wanting to know who is sending all this e-mails around trying to get the bloggers upset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor At Large<br />
As posted on TC as well</p>
<p>March 30th, 2008 at 9:05 pm</p>
<p>I have to admit that when I received that e-mail from Glam I was very worried. I have an exclusive contract with Glam for all of my sites and it provides 100% of my revenue. I immediately contacted Julieta Alvarado Glam’s Community Director and the person I prefer to deal with over there. She told me that Glam was contractually obligated to pay on their minimums whether they serve a house ad or not.</p>
<p>She explained to me why there were doing this, she took the time to put my mind at ease and referred to the section in the e-mail that says: “On March 25, Glam will reduce the number of house ads we deliver to your site and will begin serving the new default ads in their place. However, we will continue to run paid house ads on your site to fulfill the minimum commitments that Glam has contractually agreed to”.</p>
<p>Now that I understand how this new system works I am even more firm in my decision to stay with Glam.</p>
<p>I have been a network member since 2006 and so far I have nothing but good things to say about Glam. I don’t see how this new system is detrimental to bloggers. It will give us more choices and opportunities to make money.</p>
<p>Besides the money I make in banner ads I get revenue from other programs that Glam offers. I just do not see Federated Media or Gorilla Nation doing that.</p>
<p>I looked into Federated and Gorilla and the experience of dealing with them, specially Gorilla left a bitter taste in my mouth.</p>
<p>I will stick with Glam for the foreseable future: They provide me with very decent CPMs, other revenue opportunities and treat me as a valued partner in their business.</p>
<p>This posting may be a case of a blogger getting hysterical over something she or he doesn’t understand. If I were Glam I would be wanting to know who is sending all this e-mails around trying to get the bloggers upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/comment-page-1/#comment-800797</link>
		<dc:creator>MH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/30/glam-fast-growing-womans-network-makes-ad-change/#comment-800797</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate more on the premium products that GLAM
targets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate more on the premium products that GLAM<br />
targets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
