<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter worth $150 million?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter finally gets its new round of funding; &#8220;very strong&#8221; valuation &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-817959</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter finally gets its new round of funding; &#8220;very strong&#8221; valuation &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-817959</guid>
		<description>[...] been in the works for several months, but Twitter has finally announced its new round of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been in the works for several months, but Twitter has finally announced its new round of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Twitter emergency broadcast system in the works &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-817829</link>
		<dc:creator>A Twitter emergency broadcast system in the works &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-817829</guid>
		<description>[...] often write about Twitter&#8217;s downtime issues, but the fact remains that it is a very powerful communication tool when working properly. The service has improved greatly since bringing in outside help from Pivotal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often write about Twitter&#8217;s downtime issues, but the fact remains that it is a very powerful communication tool when working properly. The service has improved greatly since bringing in outside help from Pivotal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plurk炫风吹，比Twitter更简单易懂的微型碎碎念 &#124; IDEA DATABASE</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-815626</link>
		<dc:creator>Plurk炫风吹，比Twitter更简单易懂的微型碎碎念 &#124; IDEA DATABASE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-815626</guid>
		<description>[...] 这个数学很简单的。美国随便一个社群型网站都破1000万会员，Twitter只有100万。如果把Twitter这种气氛拉到任何其它一个300万人，以Twitter值1.5亿美元的估值，可以拉到至少4亿，也就是和当年一亿会员的MySpace一样的估值。两年一亿会员或许真是个「后人无人可及」的奇迹，但区区300万会员呢？Plurk以「大简单上加小复杂」深思远虑下去，自有它的机会。我们也该来想想，还有哪些已经成功的网站，可以像手机一样，再被做得更薄、更直觉、更简单？简单以后，再加一点点小复杂，又可以炒出另一盘好吃的菜！ 整个 Yo2 上的相关文章:未找到任何相关文章 cT=&quot;0&quot;;nc=&quot;#444444&quot;;nBgc=&quot;#FFF7DE&quot;;nBorder=&quot;#F5E5A9&quot;; tc=&quot;#649B00&quot;;tBgc=&quot;#FFF4D0&quot;;tBorder=&quot;#F5E5A9&quot;; tDigg=&quot;%E6%8E%A8%E8%8D%90&quot;;tDugg=&quot;%E5%B7%B2%E8%8D%90&quot;; defaultItemUrl=&quot;http://keeli.yo2.cn/articles/plurk%e7%82%ab%e9%a3%8e%e5%90%b9%ef%bc%8c%e6%af%94twitter%e6%9b%b4%e7%ae%80%e5%8d%95%e6%98%93%e6%87%82%e7%9a%84%e5%be%ae%e5%9e%8b%e7%a2%8e%e7%a2%8e%e5%bf%b5.html&quot;;defaultFeedUrl =&quot;http://keeli.yo2.cn/feed&quot;; printYo2FavControl(&quot;&quot;,&quot;&quot;,&quot;Plurk炫风吹，比Twitter更简单易懂的微型碎碎念&quot;,&quot; 最近发现了一个新网站「Plurk」，这篇文章与这个网站，就像深水炸弹，为此周带来第一个「哇点」！Plurk显然是冲着Twitter而来，就像Twitter一样，可以碎碎念，写140字的小讯息，给自己看，给朋友看。但Plurk最大的不同点，就是这些小讯息皆浮在一张「时间图」上面。譬如这个叫Steno的使用者就可看出，上面是时间图，下面是这个使用者的简介，而这个「时间图」是可以按住并往左右拖曳看其它时间的讯息的。你看到的这个画面，也就是Plurk的主要页面，人人几乎都在这一页活动。这个「时间图」设&quot;);最近阅读过此文章的网友:   Tags: Twitter    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 这个数学很简单的。美国随便一个社群型网站都破1000万会员，Twitter只有100万。如果把Twitter这种气氛拉到任何其它一个300万人，以Twitter值1.5亿美元的估值，可以拉到至少4亿，也就是和当年一亿会员的MySpace一样的估值。两年一亿会员或许真是个「后人无人可及」的奇迹，但区区300万会员呢？Plurk以「大简单上加小复杂」深思远虑下去，自有它的机会。我们也该来想想，还有哪些已经成功的网站，可以像手机一样，再被做得更薄、更直觉、更简单？简单以后，再加一点点小复杂，又可以炒出另一盘好吃的菜！ 整个 Yo2 上的相关文章:未找到任何相关文章 cT=&#8221;0&#8243;;nc=&#8221;#444444&#8243;;nBgc=&#8221;#FFF7DE&#8221;;nBorder=&#8221;#F5E5A9&#8243;; tc=&#8221;#649B00&#8243;;tBgc=&#8221;#FFF4D0&#8243;;tBorder=&#8221;#F5E5A9&#8243;; tDigg=&#8221;%E6%8E%A8%E8%8D%90&#8243;;tDugg=&#8221;%E5%B7%B2%E8%8D%90&#8243;; defaultItemUrl=&#8221;http://keeli.yo2.cn/articles/plurk%e7%82%ab%e9%a3%8e%e5%90%b9%ef%bc%8c%e6%af%94twitter%e6%9b%b4%e7%ae%80%e5%8d%95%e6%98%93%e6%87%82%e7%9a%84%e5%be%ae%e5%9e%8b%e7%a2%8e%e7%a2%8e%e5%bf%b5.html&#8221;;defaultFeedUrl =&#8221;http://keeli.yo2.cn/feed&#8221;; printYo2FavControl(&#8221;",&#8221;",&#8221;Plurk炫风吹，比Twitter更简单易懂的微型碎碎念&#8221;,&#8221; 最近发现了一个新网站「Plurk」，这篇文章与这个网站，就像深水炸弹，为此周带来第一个「哇点」！Plurk显然是冲着Twitter而来，就像Twitter一样，可以碎碎念，写140字的小讯息，给自己看，给朋友看。但Plurk最大的不同点，就是这些小讯息皆浮在一张「时间图」上面。譬如这个叫Steno的使用者就可看出，上面是时间图，下面是这个使用者的简介，而这个「时间图」是可以按住并往左右拖曳看其它时间的讯息的。你看到的这个画面，也就是Plurk的主要页面，人人几乎都在这一页活动。这个「时间图」设&#8221;);最近阅读过此文章的网友:   Tags: Twitter    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter may have more serious issues than its downtime &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-814422</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter may have more serious issues than its downtime &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-814422</guid>
		<description>[...] we crack a lot of jokes about Twitter&#8217;s uptime and go on about its potential valuation, it&#8217;s easy to forget that as with many communication tools, there is the potential for real, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we crack a lot of jokes about Twitter&#8217;s uptime and go on about its potential valuation, it&#8217;s easy to forget that as with many communication tools, there is the potential for real, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The turnaround begins? Twitter gets its $15 million funding &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-814275</link>
		<dc:creator>The turnaround begins? Twitter gets its $15 million funding &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-814275</guid>
		<description>[...] is said to be for $15 million and will put Twitter&#8217;s valuation near $80 million. Not the $150 million some were suggesting, but not too shabby [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is said to be for $15 million and will put Twitter&#8217;s valuation near $80 million. Not the $150 million some were suggesting, but not too shabby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The turnaround begins? Twitter gets its $15 million funding &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-814276</link>
		<dc:creator>The turnaround begins? Twitter gets its $15 million funding &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-814276</guid>
		<description>[...] is said to be for $15 million and will put Twitter&#8217;s valuation near $80 million. Not the $150 million some were suggesting, but not too shabby [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is said to be for $15 million and will put Twitter&#8217;s valuation near $80 million. Not the $150 million some were suggesting, but not too shabby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finally The News Media Wake Up To Twitter &#183; ReporTwitters Blog</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-813872</link>
		<dc:creator>Finally The News Media Wake Up To Twitter &#183; ReporTwitters Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-813872</guid>
		<description>[...] largely ignored this fact, but it happened nonetheless. Now, with so many people thinking about  Twitter valuations, and whining about Twitter not being mainstream, the service is starting to garner attention for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] largely ignored this fact, but it happened nonetheless. Now, with so many people thinking about  Twitter valuations, and whining about Twitter not being mainstream, the service is starting to garner attention for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen Schweitzer</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-813705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen Schweitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-813705</guid>
		<description>I dont get it either, it just doesnt make any sense. I would never use Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont get it either, it just doesnt make any sense. I would never use Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obligatory post about Twitter being down yet again &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-813240</link>
		<dc:creator>Obligatory post about Twitter being down yet again &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-813240</guid>
		<description>[...] are in situations like the recent earthquake in China. I write long rants defending your value and eventual viability. And then you let me down &#8212; with your constant downtime. I feel like people are so close to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are in situations like the recent earthquake in China. I write long rants defending your value and eventual viability. And then you let me down &#8212; with your constant downtime. I feel like people are so close to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter is first on the scene for a major earthquake &#8212; but who cares about that, is it mainstream yet? &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-812642</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter is first on the scene for a major earthquake &#8212; but who cares about that, is it mainstream yet? &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-812642</guid>
		<description>[...] largely ignored this fact, but it happened none-the-less. Now, with so many people thinking about Twitter valuations, and whining about Twitter not being mainstream, the service is starting to garner attention for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] largely ignored this fact, but it happened none-the-less. Now, with so many people thinking about Twitter valuations, and whining about Twitter not being mainstream, the service is starting to garner attention for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumanpark's me2DAY</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-811029</link>
		<dc:creator>sumanpark's me2DAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-811029</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;만박의 생각...&lt;/strong&gt;

트위터 회사가치 1500억원? 그보다 요즘에 나온 트위터 관련 소식들이 재미있구나. Chief Architect는 회사를 그만뒀다는 얘기나, 이집트 여행하던 대학생이 체포됐는데 트위터에 올려서 풀려났다...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>만박의 생각&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>트위터 회사가치 1500억원? 그보다 요즘에 나온 트위터 관련 소식들이 재미있구나. Chief Architect는 회사를 그만뒀다는 얘기나, 이집트 여행하던 대학생이 체포됐는데 트위터에 올려서 풀려났다&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft now has $50 billion burning a hole in its pocket&#8230; &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-809474</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft now has $50 billion burning a hole in its pocket&#8230; &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-809474</guid>
		<description>[...] be had for what Microsoft would consider pocket change &#8212; even the highest valuations are &#8220;only&#8221; $150 million. There would be a lot of questions as to what Microsoft would actually do with Twitter (as well as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be had for what Microsoft would consider pocket change &#8212; even the highest valuations are &#8220;only&#8221; $150 million. There would be a lot of questions as to what Microsoft would actually do with Twitter (as well as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitwise: Twitter traffic is, in fact, going up (but still not big) &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-806742</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitwise: Twitter traffic is, in fact, going up (but still not big) &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-806742</guid>
		<description>[...] roll in helping an American reporter get out of an Egyptian jail as well as public debate about its rumored funding (Twitter is a poster child for web companies that focus on growth, rather than revenue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] roll in helping an American reporter get out of an Egyptian jail as well as public debate about its rumored funding (Twitter is a poster child for web companies that focus on growth, rather than revenue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Much atwitter about nothing? &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-806514</link>
		<dc:creator>Much atwitter about nothing? &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-806514</guid>
		<description>[...] the tech sphere probably have similar stories. (I actually brought up this exact point on Friday as point three of my post on Twitter&#8217;s value.) But such stories downplay a few key elements in the larger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the tech sphere probably have similar stories. (I actually brought up this exact point on Friday as point three of my post on Twitter&#8217;s value.) But such stories downplay a few key elements in the larger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scabr</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/04/25/is-twitter-worth-150-million/comment-page-1/#comment-806379</link>
		<dc:creator>Scabr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91505#comment-806379</guid>
		<description>If I think about Twitter&#039;s worth than I remember Facebook&#039;s     
$15 billion estimation. Maybe Twitter potential compares with   
Facebook one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I think about Twitter&#8217;s worth than I remember Facebook&#8217;s<br />
$15 billion estimation. Maybe Twitter potential compares with<br />
Facebook one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
