<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Live gestates for 9 months, won&#8217;t survive delivery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/yahoo-live-gestates-for-9-months-wont-survive-delivery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/yahoo-live-gestates-for-9-months-wont-survive-delivery/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Live not just an event after all, but a live-streaming service? &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/yahoo-live-gestates-for-9-months-wont-survive-delivery/comment-page-1/#comment-833208</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Live not just an event after all, but a live-streaming service? &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=99938#comment-833208</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s been widely publicized that YouTube&#8217;s parent, Google, has had a hard time monetizing the site, and live streaming may even be harder to do given the sporadic nature of on-the-fly content. It would also be very expensive in terms of bandwidth costs to run a live streaming site, as Silicon Alley Insider noted back in August and as was evidenced by Yahoo&#8217;s recent decision to shut down Yahoo Live, it&#8217;s live streaming service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s been widely publicized that YouTube&#8217;s parent, Google, has had a hard time monetizing the site, and live streaming may even be harder to do given the sporadic nature of on-the-fly content. It would also be very expensive in terms of bandwidth costs to run a live streaming site, as Silicon Alley Insider noted back in August and as was evidenced by Yahoo&#8217;s recent decision to shut down Yahoo Live, it&#8217;s live streaming service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
