Apple hints that Palm’s ability to sync with iTunes may be short-lived

no-palmAt a recent conference, Palm executives proudly proclaimed the recently launched Pre smartphone’s ability to synchronize with Apple’s iTunes media. But the technical achievement may turn out to be temporary.

Apple hinted that future versions of iTunes may break compatibility with third-party media players. That’s one interpretation of a cryptic post that Apple made on its web site about how it’s not able to guarantee claims by third parties that their devices will be able to sync with iTunes. Of course, the wording doesn’t mention Palm and the threats are veiled. Here’s the text of what Apple said:

Apple designs the hardware and software to provide seamless integration of the iPhone and iPod with iTunes, the iTunes Store, and tens of thousands of apps on the App Store. Apple is aware that some third-parties claim that their digital media players are able to sync with Apple software. However, Apple does not provide support for, or test for compatibility with, non-Apple digital media players and, because software changes over time, newer versions of Apple’s iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with non-Apple digital media players.

Palm may see one of the prime selling points of the Pre evaporate overnight if Apple makes a change that Palm’s engineers can’t find a way around. Other digital media device makers are also likely to be affected by this kind of change, since Apple’s iTunes content is a kind of defacto standard.

Apple has to tread carefully here, since it can’t make changes just for the sake of shutting out rivals. The Department of Justice doesn’t take kindly these days to anti-competitive behavior. Nor does the European Union, which has forced Microsoft to accommodate third-party browsers and third-party search engines on its Windows operating systems.

Apple is a dominant player in the digital media player market, and as such its behavior will be closely watched by antitrust regulators.

[Are you an entrepreneur or executive active in mobile? Join us at MobileBeat 2009, our mobile conference for industry leaders, where we’ll be debating these ecosystem wars. Sign up soon.]

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: ,

Photo of Dean Takahashi

About the Author, Dean Takahashi

Dean is lead writer for GamesBeat at VentureBeat. He covers video games, security, chips and a variety of other subjects. Dean previously worked at the San Jose Mercury News, the Wall Street Journal, the Red Herring, the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register and the Dallas Times Herald. He is the author of two books, Opening the Xbox and the Xbox 360 Uncloaked. Follow him on Twitter at @deantak, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • benjitek
    Personally, I'd rather see it the other way around. I'd like to sync my iPhone with something other than iTunes. Having been a longtime user of J.River Media Center, I was disappointed that I'm not able to use it as my media manager for my iPhone -- it makes iTunes look like an abacus :(

    http://www.jrmediacenter.com/
  • itrush
    Ouch! I'm about to give it a go.. anywayz, keep us posted VB.
  • Robertor
    But then it's Apple, who gets away with using their iPod/iTunes monopoly to push Safari (via a forced software update), and tying free iTouches to push Macs. The brazen nature of this specific Pre-targeted message sums it up: they think the rules don't apply to them because so far they haven't.
  • JustinM
    If Apple does indeed block the Pre it would only bolster my reasoning for refusing to use iTunes or any other Apple related products. It bugs the hell out of me how they try to control your content, not that I couldn't easily get around it, but it's about principle. Apple reminds me of a expensive and controlling girlfriend that eats away at you... heh
  • @JustinM: but a HAWT girlfriend!
  • Wouldn't blocking any other media device from accessing/syncing iTunes except Apple approved stuff be a monopoly (somewhat)? Isn't that illegal?
blog comments powered by Disqus